Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] looking at Pentax *ist D
From: sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner)
Date: Mon Mar 14 18:52:18 2005
References: <002901c528fe$4f36c1c0$092d000a@ccapr.com>

Naw, this cannot be Leica-bashing; because ole B.D. only complains about old 
Leica bottle-glass.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 8:28 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] looking at Pentax *ist D


> But Mark, unfortunately your arthritis doesn't tell what Leica will do.
> Because if it really makes sense, Leica's unlikely to do it. Were that
> not true, they would have kept the M5 alive and pushed it with good
> marketing, and they would have kept a CL-like camera in the line. But
> they didn't have the imagination to do either, and instead deep-sixed
> both, and returned to the M3 -uh, sorry, M4, ;-), finally putting a
> meter in it again in, what, 1984?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
> Mark Rabiner
> Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 7:27 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] looking at Pentax *ist D
>
>
> On 3/13/05 4:59 PM, "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> typed:
>
>> Mark Rabiner wrote...
>>
>> "And Leica, should it survive, will when it comes out with it's
>> digital body have its eye on compactness. Not an R8/9 based life form.
>
>> They'll aim more at the CL."
>>
>> And you know this because...?
>>
>>
>>
> It's my arthritis, BD. It acts up every 30 years when the camera
> industry realizes it's products are porcine and puts them on a diet..
> When camera companies realize that the size of a camera body should
> reflect the size of it's format. Image circle.
>
> Maitani with his Olympus OM1 took 33% off the weight and bulk of the
> 35mm SLR camera industry as the were all caught with their pants down
> and had to follow suit or look like idiots and go out of business. By
> the way I just checked the dates to find out the relationship between
> the CL and OM1.
>
> Olympus OM1 1972
> Leica CL 1973
>
> http://www.geocities.com/maitani_fan/om_concept.html
>
>
> I found these original Maitani ads and controversy
> http://www.geocities.com/maitani_fan/maitani_adv.html
>
>
>
> Mark Rabiner
> Photography
> Portland Oregon
> http://rabinergroup.com/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] looking at Pentax *ist D)