Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/06/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Photoessay: Japan disability protest 2005.05.12
From: mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura)
Date: Thu Jun 2 23:39:03 2005
References: <000401c567c8$2c3cf640$5540e344@newukolbqveo9i><a0600100abec551b65c51@gpsy .com><6.1.0.6.2.20050602180757.05ebf890@192.168.100.42><a06001010bec576f41 71d@gpsy.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20050602224328.05edb7c0@192.168.100.42>
>
>Thanks. I actually do know the Emishi are different from the
>Untouchables. I didn't know there are two untouchable classes
>though. The confusion came in my English structure. Should the comma
>be there or not?
>
>Emishi, or (also) the Untouchables
>or
>Emishi or (also) the Untouchables
>?
Err.... The emishi have nothing to do with the former outcaste
groups at all. I'm not sure what you're trying to say. The emishi
don't exist in the current moment. They were forced out over a
thousand years ago, it's kind of hard to take photos of them.
KN
--
Karen Nakamura
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/
http://www.photoethnography.com/blog/
Replies:
Reply from msmall at aya.yale.edu (Marc James Small) ([Leica] OT: Japanese Social and Racial Groups)
Reply from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Photoessay: Japan disability protest 2005.05.12)
In reply to:
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Photoessay: Japan disability protest 2005.05.12)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] Photoessay: Japan disability protest 2005.05.12)