Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/07/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Kodak 2nd quarter woes and what should film dinosuars donow?
From: sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner)
Date: Thu Jul 21 14:13:26 2005
References: <9b678e05072108206cbe192b@mail.gmail.com> <69ADBDB6-EC2F-4F50-838A-AB73F862FC65@earthlink.net> <38aee5342031c1121cdd290e3701fc26@interlink.es> <6C057F63-C15A-41A3-9317-18CB7DF0083F@earthlink.net> <41da43d850a7c7a09cb7a2584842ae67@interlink.es> <C6E46619-5DF3-43AF-A470-7D72287E5DAD@earthlink.net> <46df889a2cc36c05bda7ed8c61dd8e2b@interlink.es> <9b678e05072113489335e54@mail.gmail.com>

Don, I fail to see the logic: Ilford has already been in bankruptcy or 
receivership. It is a tiny company by comparison to Kodak and with very 
limited resources.

I too like Tri-X and have used it since first introduction. It ain't going 
away. IMHO.

Take a look at the Kodak website - you had not seen my last post before you 
wrote the below.

Best,

Seth

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Don Dory" <don.dory@gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Kodak 2nd quarter woes and what should film dinosuars 
donow?


>I actually like Tri-X as a film.  However, I don't trust Kodak to keep
> making it while I do trust Ilford to be in business for a while
> longer.  Likewise, I think Fuji will keep pumping out Neopan for a
> while.
>
> I think that it would be better if the remaining film sales were
> concentrated with companies that might keep making products that we
> like.
>
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com
>
> On 7/21/05, Luis Miguel Casta?eda <lmc@interlink.es> wrote:
>> On 21 de jul de 2005, at 18:21, feli wrote:
>>
>> > Out of curiosity, what changes to Tri-X, didn't you like? To me the
>> > grain seems tighter,
>> > while still retaining the same 'pattern'. The development times
>> > changed a little, but other
>> > than that it seems the same...
>>
>> It seems to be slightly less contrasted (okay isn't scientifically
>> tested), the grain structure looks to be more like delta or TMAX than
>> my old negatives; and I hate the orange thing + crystal clear base that
>> ruined all my darkroom habits. :)
>>
>> On the other hand it's a very good film yet, a bit expensive, but I
>> find HP-5+ more close to my old negs than the tri-x itself.
>>
>> Anyway, it's just me.
>>
>>
>> Saludos
>> -----------------------------------------
>> http://imaginarymagnitude.net/blog/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Kodak 2nd quarter woes and what should film dinosuars do now?)
Message from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] Kodak 2nd quarter woes and what should film dinosuars do now?)
Message from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] Kodak 2nd quarter woes and what should film dinosuars do now?)
Message from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] Kodak 2nd quarter woes and what should film dinosuars do now?)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Kodak 2nd quarter woes and what should film dinosuars do now?)