Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Neopan 400 vs. delta 400 in Xtol
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Sat Aug 13 19:12:30 2005
References: <9b678e0508111655707826df@mail.gmail.com> <BF23E9DA.19D58%mark@rabinergroup.com> <9b678e05081318487ed9e303@mail.gmail.com>

Hmmm... "everyone" swears up and down that you need at least 100-125 ml. of 
Xtol per roll... Is Mark someone special with super power :-)?

At 06:48 PM 8/13/2005, Don Dory wrote:

>Mark,
>First, interesting times for Neopan 400.  I've been running thirteen
>minutes in Xtol 1:3.  Hmmm, I'll have to try a longer time to see what
>happens: although you are running about 63ml of Xtol and not the
>recommended 100 ml if I remember correctly.

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com) 


Replies: Reply from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Neopan 400 vs. delta 400 in Xtol)
Reply from mail at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] Neopan 400 vs. delta 400 in Xtol)
In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] neopan 400 vs. delta 400 in Xtol)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Neopan 400 vs. delta 400 in Xtol)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Neopan 400 vs. delta 400 in Xtol)