Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/08/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Neopan 400 vs. delta 400 in Xtol
From: scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin)
Date: Sat Aug 13 19:05:20 2005
References: <9b678e0508111655707826df@mail.gmail.com> <BF23E9DA.19D58%mark@rabinergroup.com> <9b678e05081318487ed9e303@mail.gmail.com>
 
That's odd to me on the short supply. I always thought that
Fuji along with Ilford would be one of the staunch B&W
holdouts. 

Fulfilling demand shouldn't pose any particular challenges for
Fuji that I can imagine if they were commited.

So what gives?

Scott

Don Dory wrote:

>[snip]
>  
>
>Second, where are you getting your Neopan 400?  My local stores are
>out and B&H has been backordered.
>
>Don
>don.dory@gmail.com
>
>  
>
>
In reply to: Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] neopan 400 vs. delta 400 in Xtol)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Neopan 400 vs. delta 400 in Xtol)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Neopan 400 vs. delta 400 in Xtol)