Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2005/08/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?
From: rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Thu Aug 25 09:58:20 2005
References: <8DFFA731-5BC1-493B-B6AB-92D9053539CF@mindspring.com> <430CB4D7.3000608@wanadoo.nl> <41B5BE67-1AC3-4EDF-BE38-0004D88ECA9A@mindspring.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050825105327.03215ad8@pop.med.cornell.edu> <6.2.1.2.2.20050825171542.03c6ab30@mail.screengang.com> <6.2.1.2.2.20050825114451.00c2c8b0@pop.med.cornell.edu>
Chris
Yes my english is not as good as my german and french and I have explained
me correctly.
It is true there are many frauds especially on the auction site; but I have
learned to evaluate the risks there.
Didier
>Perhaps there is a language problem, but, I never said a used lenses is
>not satisfying, "A satisfying lens is priceless" which means be careful
>when buying a used lens because it is easy to be fckued. The fraud out
>there is tremendous.
>
>Chris
Replies:
Reply from leicanikon at earthlink.net (Stephen Gandy) ([Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?)
In reply to:
Message from jdos2 at mindspring.com (Jeff Sumner) ([Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?)
Message from jdos2 at mindspring.com (Jeff Sumner) ([Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?)
Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?)
Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Elmarit 28mm (used) or Zeiss 28mm for M?)