Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/10/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] eyes...
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Sun Oct 30 09:12:42 2005
References: <140.4f80da67.30962118@aol.com>

On Oct 30, 2005, at 6:14 AM, SonC@aol.com wrote:

>
>
> In a message dated 10/30/2005 5:30:52 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> kididdoc@cox.net writes:
>
> _http://www.leica-gallery.net/barbour/image-88484.html_
> (http://www.leica-gallery.net/barbour/image-88484.html)
>
> if Sonny wants to show in Friday flowers, a flower on a coffee  mug,
> or a jet fighter.... I will look and not  complain...
>
>
> Of course, and I have even shown them in a flower bed.
> _http://www.sonc.com/flower_bed.htm_ (http://www.sonc.com/ 
> flower_bed.htm)


love it Sonny...
>
>
> But the context in a set need not be explained.  Had there been  
> one  more
> shot of someone ignoring the camera, that might have change  
> everything in  my
> mind.  The context of the set was several people looking right at  
> the  lens and
> one not.  I'm not complaining, I just think the set would be   
> stronger without
> him.  Not only the eyes, bot the entire  composition of 85 seems at  
> odds with
> the others.  More than mere  dissonance.

I understand of course...


most important, thanks for your comments, Steve
>
>
> Regards,
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> Oldest continuous  settlement in La Louisiane
> ?galit?, libert?,  crawfish
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] eyes...)