Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: OT Re: [Leica] still more on Leica "rumor" and NYT
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Wed Jan 4 14:03:26 2006
References: <BFE1AACD.A49D%bdcolen@comcast.net> <35F82D22-0038-4F2A-8627-0715B3BC0283@spectare.com>
Hear, here (covering all bases :-) ). At least there's less danger of ad
hominem attack with rumor mongering.
Say, have you heard that Salgado is now using Canon?
(OK, I just made that up)
At 01:56 PM 1/4/2006, Jim Laurel wrote:
>Will you guys please give it a rest so we can get back to our rumor-
>mongering?
>
>--Jim Laurel
// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please
use richard at imagecraft.com)
Replies:
Reply from jdos2 at mindspring.com (Jeff Sumner) (OT Re: [Leica] still more on Leica "rumor" and NYT)
Reply from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) (OT Re: [Leica] still more on Leica "rumor" and NYT)
In reply to:
Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) (OT Re: [Leica] still more on Leica "rumor" and NYT)
Message from jplaurel at spectare.com (Jim Laurel) (OT Re: [Leica] still more on Leica "rumor" and NYT)