Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Microtek vs. Nikon scanners?
From: gwpics at googlemail.com (Gerry Walden)
Date: Wed Jan 25 10:06:49 2006
References: <7985556.1138211610707.JavaMail.root@elwamui-ovcar.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

My only brush with a Microtek was at a demonstration, and even they
could not get it operating properly. I used to have a Nikon which was
very reliable, and later changed to a Canon FS4000US because of the
higher resolution. I can thoroughly recmmend the Canon and suggest you
also give that a look.

Gerry

> I agree w.r.t. the SCSI interface, and this probably will be the first 
> thing that will make using my Polaroid SS4000 problematic on a future 
> computer.  The Polaroid is a clone of the Microtek, and regarding film 
> handling it's more tolerant of film that isn't perfectly flat than the 
> Nikon scanners are.  The problem is in the scanner's depth of field; you'd 
> see the problem at the edges of the picture where the scan is out of focus 
> when the center is properly focussed.
>
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


--
Gerry Walden LBPPA
Web: www.gwpics.com
Stock: www.digitalrailroad.net
Tel: +44 (0)23 8046 3076


Replies: Reply from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Microtek vs. Nikon scanners?)
In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] Microtek vs. Nikon scanners?)