Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Further adventures of a completely screwed up guy: long and occasionally on topic
From: bruce at ralgo.nl (bruce)
Date: Sun Jan 29 14:25:03 2006
References: <FLEMIMNJEAKPONMFMEABIEBDCFAA.ksteels@sympatico.ca> <FLEMIMNJEAKPONMFMEABIEBDCFAA.ksteels@sympatico.ca> <5.1.0.14.2.20060129115731.0297af28@ipostoffice.worldnet.att.net>

What a spec. Mouthwatering .............. or is that Dutch? The image  
is a marketing man's dream .............. in a leafy glade, but, it  
seems (not clear) to miss one thing, RHD ............ it is British,  
after all!

B.

On 29-jan-2006, at 18:22, William G. Lamb, III wrote:

>
> Hello Frank,
>
> Mine's a wide-body with Classic Koni's and a few light suspension
> mods, 16" knock-on alloys (rare), shod with Sport Pilots, and it has
> 190 BHP at 4,750 with 242 ft./lbs. at 3,250. It weighs 2,278 lbs. wet.
> 0 - 60 is only 5.9 sec., but it's the 30 to 80 MPH in 3rd which  
> produces
> the grins, embarrasses the really expensive iron, and terrifies 1st- 
> time
> passengers.
>
> Only thing modern about it is the dedicated SAGEM EFi and the
> Superform alloy wings, but it's great fun for occasional use. I could
> use another 10%, but I'd have to upgrade so much other stuff to
> handle the power, it just isn't worth it to me. I also no longer have
> the cash. :-)
>
> A friend and ex-RN Harrier test pilot with a similar car who now
> lives in Annapolis has dropped in a 4.5 RPI with mild cam and
> SAGEM and now has 285 BHP. He's spent a small fortune with
> necessary upgrades to everything to handle it. As David was the
> first to launch an old Harrier from a ski-jump carrier, naturally
> he's certifiable, (but the "war stories" are excellent :-).
>
> Here's a D1 snap of my rig. Must get some proper Leica snaps
> some day. <http://gallery.leica-users.org/album25/LUG194?full=1>
>
> How's the team shaping up for '06 BTW?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> William
>
> At 04:14 PM 1/29/2006 +0000, you wrote:
>> Not so. The Morgan is great fun and an anacronism but a sports car
>> should use latest technology. The chassis and suspension on the
>> Morgan is poor by current standards, mind you I think I would rather
>> have a crude old fashioned light car than a crude heavy modern 2 seat
>> limo.
>> Frank
>>
>> On 29 Jan, 2006, at 14:58, Ken Steels wrote:
>>
>>> Yes someone still makes a true sports car - Morgan
>>>
>>> Ken
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from ksteels at sympatico.ca (Ken Steels) ([Leica] Further adventures of a completely screwed up guy: longand occasionally on topic)
Message from lambroving at worldnet.att.net (William G. Lamb, III) ([Leica] Further adventures of a completely screwed up guy: long and occasionally on topic)