Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:kodachrome NOW VOLUNTEER'S
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Tue Jan 31 17:15:53 2006
References: <r02010500-1044-D2174BE792A211DA89590011246F5C92@[66.239.170.188]> <029701c626b9$83568ad0$56e74142@D1S9FY41> <6.2.3.4.2.20060131182636.01e52828@mail.rhtc.net>

Tina said most militantly:
>>> Not me!!  I'm allergic to all of those chemical solutions.  Since
> Kodak switched to Qualchrome for Kodachrome processing and ruined lots of 
> my irreplaceable film, I've totally given up on Kodak positive film.  I 
> might consider some E-6 film that I can develop myself, but I'll never 
> trust Kodak with my film developing again.  Thank God for digital!!<<<<

Whoa, hang on dear lady wait for my other post on this. However, given your 
allergies you do the paper work. ;-) B.D.  and I will do the other stuff, 
we'll hire some gophers to handle all the chemicals. I mean I've seen those 
K processing machines and the one Kodak installed in Seoul for the Summer 
Olympics and there isn't a hope in Hades of getting me near the thing as 
soon as the chemicals are loaded.

We don't need to tell Seth, we'll figure out a "cost over run" figure for 
hiring the extras to run the machine. ;-) And we'll still laugh all the way 
to the bank! :-)

It's called "Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill!" ;-)

ted


Replies: Reply from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re:kodachrome NOW VOLUNTEER'S)
In reply to: Message from imagist at imagist.cnc.net (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Re:kodachrome)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] Re:kodachrome)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Re:kodachrome)