Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA
From: don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sun Feb 5 18:00:21 2006
References: <43E44556.2060001@gmail.com> <B9C6C3CE-2E7E-4685-B6EE-6A1FE1205BC4@pandora.be> <43E55E4F.70301@gmail.com> <15271210.1139106748845.JavaMail.s_gregory1@mac.com> <22c93b290602051052w128f1026n591b9505943269b8@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20060205212353.0313a3e0@screengang.com> <22c93b290602051546r17c62861hcef8b9c78405f709@mail.gmail.com> <003101c62ab0$00423ef0$2ee76c18@ted>

You know, you could all shoot Neopan 1600 which developed in Xtol at a
dilution of 1-3 is really a 1600 speed film with normal density curve.
32200 is doable as a normal push at about 20% increase of time.  Grain is
fine and the tonality is still good.

Just my 2 cents about a really underrated film.

Don
don.dory@gmail.com


On 2/5/06, Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> Matt quit while yer a head! ;-)
> ted
> Ted Grant Photography Limited
> 1817 Feltham Road
> Victoria BC  V8N 2A4
> 250-477-2156
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matt Powell" <wooderson@gmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 05, 2006 3:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA
>
>
> > On 2/5/06, Didier Ludwig <rangefinder@screengang.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >... neither Delta 3200 nor TMax 3200 is a true 3200-speed film.
> >> Matt
> >> What do you ecaxtly mean with "not a true 3200-speed film"?  Just
> >> curious.
> >> Didier
> >
> > However ISO is measured (I believe it's shadow density at
> > something-or-other blah blah blah, I don't do testing of that kind),
> > neither of the 3200 films is a 'true' 3200 ISO (as Tri-X is a true 400
> > in certain developers, etc.). TMZ or Delta3200 at 3200 is underexposed
> > (and then push-processed).
> >
> > This is all badly explained, I'm sure.
> >
> > --
> > MP
> > wooderson@gmail.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Reply from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
In reply to: Message from evanowski at gmail.com (Edmund Evanowski) ([Leica] poorly framed & composed snaps?)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] poorly framed & composed snaps?)
Message from evanowski at gmail.com (Edmund Evanowski) ([Leica] poorly framed & composed snaps?)
Message from s_gregory1 at mac.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Message from rangefinder at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Message from wooderson at gmail.com (Matt Powell) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] Recommendations re: Kodak 3200 ASA)