Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/02/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 50/2.8 Elmars...
From: jblack at ambio.net (John Black)
Date: Fri Feb 24 12:42:43 2006
References: <A11B782A-6CE4-4D4B-B133-CFE5710163DD@cox.net>


> Is there any optical difference between the old chrome 50/2.8
> collapsible Elmars of the 1950's to 1974,  and the newer 50/2.8
> Elmars which were issued starting sometime in the 1990's...

Yes, the new version is better. Higher contrast but fine with B&W and quite
sharp wide open. Somewhat more compact too.

>
> Does anyone experienced in using these lenses see any differences in
> the photos from them?
>
> Which vintage is preferable if in good shape, and the cost not
> considered?

You can usually find a really good specimen of the newer lens for just under
$500. The older ones are a little hard to find in good shape, especially the
LTM ones from the late 50s.  I do miss the focusing tab which is not present
on the new one though.

JB, who has 2 of the newer ones. One chrome and one black.





In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] 50/2.8 Elmars...)