Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/03/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fast Primes, good...
From: vondauster at earthlink.net (Will von Dauster)
Date: Sat Mar 25 09:29:07 2006
References: <C04ADA07.E75B%bdcolen@comcast.net>

On Mar 25, 2006, at 9:29 AM, B. D. Colen wrote:

> Those are gorgeous images, Tina. And yet, over the years, you and I  
> have
> both seen similar sorts of images shot by photographers who, like  
> you, knew
> what they were doing, that were shot using 1.4 Nikon, Canon,  
> Minolta, Zeiss,
> Olympus, and, yes, Leica ( ;-) ) lenses. I would suggest that most  
> times
> when it's impossible to get the shot without a lens faster than 1.4  
> - and I
> stress most - the overall lighting is just so damn low and flat  
> that even
> with a Super Lens the resulting photo is just muddy and flat. Most  
> - stress
> on most again - of the time when there are splashes of light in the  
> dark, as
> in your photos, 1.4 will do the trick. But of course there are,  
> admittedly,
> those couple times a year that fall outside the mostness, and then  
> it's have
> faster glass or miss the shot. :-)

The current lack of fast primes is one of the reasons I hesitate to  
move from Canon to Olympus. The lack of a 10MP or better E-2 is the  
other...

Will von Dauster

Replies: Reply from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Fast Primes, good...)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at comcast.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] About the Noctilux)