Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/05/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A bit of Margritte?
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Sun May 7 09:31:53 2006
References: <682308E9-6A60-441C-BFD5-1B999BE794A2@pandora.be> <p06230935c083c24ddfd4@[10.0.1.3]> <F71C8B5B-828E-49F6-8A4A-0D9E08251B2A@pandora.be> <p06230936c083ce25a65b@[10.0.1.3]>

Well, strangeness is a part of Margritte's surrealism :-)



Op 7-mei-06, om 18:23 heeft Richard S. Taylor het volgende geschreven:

> Philippe - In all seriousness, the problem I'm having with the shot  
> is that whatever the atmospheric conditions, you would never see  
> deep blue sky (implying atmospheric clarity) and half the moon.  If  
> there was a haze, the sky would be more grayish, the moon pale, and  
> the dark half of the disc hidden in it.
>
> With a full moon and a deep blue sky, the double exposure would work.
>
> On the other hand, maybe strangeness is what you were looking for  
> here.
>
>
>> Why you know how I love this particular program of the Adobe  
>> family, Richard :-)
>>
>> Seriously now: as I already explained to Luis, this is a double  
>> exposure, the moon shot being pulled in a bit more than it appears  
>> in reality here . An old trick really.
>> Now -and maybe this is due to smog, haze or another form of air  
>> contamination- on the 10,2 Mpeg RAW file  of the moon shot, the  
>> shadow part is not visible. So I didn't use it in the final image  
>> either.
>>
>> Thanks for looking,
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>>
>> Op 7-mei-06, om 17:37 heeft Richard S. Taylor het volgende  
>> geschreven:
>>
>>> Nice shot Philippe.  I like the tonality and the coloration.   
>>> What really surprises me, though, is that half the Moon is  
>>> missing . Something's rotten in the state of Holland, to misquote  
>>> the Bard. Either that or someone's been   mucking about in  
>>> Photoshop again... ;-)
>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> http://www.fullflavor.be/photography/_DSC0124.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Comments are welcomed.
>>>> Thanks for looking,
>>>> Philippe
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more  
>>>> information
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Dick
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
>
> Dick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] A bit of Margritte?)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] A bit of Margritte?)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] A bit of Margritte?)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor) ([Leica] A bit of Margritte?)