Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/09/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)
From: telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr)
Date: Sun Sep 3 02:55:07 2006
References: <44FA25D8.3030006@adrenaline.com><004501c6cefe$b6976cf0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <44FA3B99.6020105@adrenaline.com> <009201c6cf18$0386f9e0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto>
On Sep 2, 2006, at 10:15 PM, Christopher Williams wrote:
> No digital can do NPH. Nada. Fuji S3 comes close. It's a shame Fuji is
> the
> only one that tries to imitate film colors. Kind of like camera
> companies
> should be the only one making cameras.
Dare I mention this on a Leica list? The DMR's color rendition on AWB
is as natural as I've seen from any film or digital camera. I rarely
have to make adjustments other than a minor tweak.
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
Replies:
Reply from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Reply from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Reply from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
In reply to:
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))