Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Sun Sep 3 06:48:47 2006
References: <44FA25D8.3030006@adrenaline.com> <004501c6cefe$b6976cf0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto> <44FA3B99.6020105@adrenaline.com> <9b678e0609030632l5f48280o454213c10f09b71f@mail.gmail.com>

another 2 cents - the whibal card is made of some thick durable resin
material.
The material is 'gray' through and through  - IE, if it scratches, it does
not matter. It is always gray.
Easily pocketted and nicely made. Doesn't bend.

anywho..
Eric


On 9/3/06, Don Dory <don.dory@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Scott,
> I will dare raise the subject again.  For a $100 or so dollars buy an Expo
> Disc and use it for custom white balance.  Use like an incident meter and
> your color will fall where they should.  Well built, easy to use and
> consistant.  You don't have to worry that your white card has gotten
> grungy
> or bent or isn't the correct shade of white.
>
> Don
> don.dory@gmail.com
>
>
> On 9/2/06, Scott McLoughlin <scott@adrenaline.com> wrote:
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > Thanks for going through all the variables I should consider.
> >
> > I've taken one vivid shot, of a rusty lamp on a boat. Dunno
> > why, but that captured the greenish patina where my normal
> > mode didn't.
> >
> > I have the camera setup for Adobe RGB. That should be ok,
> > right?  I don't recalibrate every week, but I also use a Trinitron
> > CRT that I'll calibrate every month or two.
> >
> > Perhaps it is a WB problem.
> >
> > First, generally, I'm a low contrast NPH (now 400H) kind
> > of guy.  And in the next few days I'll dip into my new
> > stash of Sensia.  NPH is more or less made for people
> > pics - popular wedding film, etc.  I wonder if I'm just not
> > going to get that kind of look out of my DSLR "in camera."
> >
> > Second, while I carry around a white card, I don't use it
> > nearly as much as I should (like having dental floss....) I
> > have to have better habits here. I have little excuse, because
> > I'm rarely a quick shooting kind of shooter.
> >
> > Third, now that I think of it, I use my DSLR with flash quite
> > a bit - either an SB800 or especially a pair of Alien Bees 800's.
> > This might present a particular kind of WB problem.
> >
> > But, I'm going to tweak the in camera settings a bit until
> > something good happens or I get bored :-)
> >
> > So, now a question - how to get a good custom WB when
> > using artificial lighting, either with on camera flash (or a flash
> > bracket) or with studio strobes?
> >
> > And a comment. My brother adopted a little black girl, and
> > her skin tones come out just fine. It seems I have a white
> > people skin problem.
> >
> > Again, thanks.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > Christopher Williams wrote:
> >
> > >Welcome to digital colors. Yes, Nikon and Canon have different color
> > looks.
> > >To me personally Nikon has more of a "film" look. I've shot both kinds
> of
> > >cameras and that's just my opinion, means nothing else. Fuji has come
> > close
> > >to great skin tones in their dSLR's but they have never achieved a
> great
> > >dSLR camera to use(slow focus, poor VF, bad body build).
> > >
> > >Most dSLR's have 3 color modes. You want to use sRGB or Abode RGB with
> > skin
> > >tones. Using RGB II or III is for landscape colors. Horrors if you have
> > your
> > >D70 or D200 on VIVID!! Shooting in NEF/RAW can keep you from constantly
> > >trying to change color corrections. And do not use Auto WB(I don't care
> > what
> > >camera you have), try using a Custom WB whenever possible - yeah I know
> > it's
> > >bitch sometimes. I usually have a good 2 minutes to do this in a church
> > or
> > >reception hall. Some cameras allow you do store Custom WB modes so you
> > can
> > >save a WB in #1 for a certain church or #2 for a certain reception
> hall.
> > >Kind of like having different kinds of film. I'd never shoot Fuji 800
> > Press
> > >for bridal portraits - who wants red skin? But it works very well in
> low
> > >light rooms where the skin tones may not matter as much as the overall
> > >feeling of the mood.
> > >There's even the ability to create a Custom Curve in your Nikon with
> > Nikon
> > >Capture. I have this in all my Nikons and believe me it helps later
> with
> > >post processing.
> > >
> > >Then there's the fun part of getting skin tones to look correct with
> home
> > >printers but that's just like at a lab where they may print with Fuji,
> > Agfa
> > >or Kodak paper.
> > >
> > >My crappy 1 cent anyway.
> > >
> > >Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Scott McLoughlin"
> > >Subject: [Leica] Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>I've been shooting with a D70 and now a D200.
> > >>
> > >>I find that skin tones with film have a certain opaque
> > >>quality, and a lean toward beige, that I like. I've never
> > >>personally shot Kodachrome, but as a viewer, I see
> > >>these qualities playing out in force.
> > >>
> > >>By comparison, my DSLRs seem to render skin tones
> > >>with a kind of transparency and pinkness.
> > >>
> > >>So I find myself in color correction mode quite frequently,
> > >>tweaking skin tones toward yellow on the color cube (I use
> > >>PWP).
> > >>
> > >>Any clue as to the causes of this discrepancy? I don't mean
> > >>to start a debate. The DSLR may well be more "true to life"
> > >>for all I know.  But I don't like it.
> > >>
> > >>Might this be a quality unique to Nikon DSLRs?
> > >>
> > >>Even better, any ideas how I might do something in camera
> > >>so that I'm not goofing with color correction all the time?
> > >>
> > >>Thanks.
> > >>
> > >>Scott
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Leica Users Group.
> > >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Pics @ http://www.adrenaline.com/snaps
> > Leica M6TTL, Bessa R, Nikon FM3a, Nikon D70, Rollei AFM35
> > (Jihad Sigint NSA FBI Patriot Act)
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

In reply to: Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Re:Skin tone - film vs. digital (not a debate))