Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/09/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Wed Sep 27 04:09:04 2006
References: <82c9dd70609231137n5c7c7e9dmd04b6ce68f0f7058@mail.gmail.com> <000501c6df40$ca000de0$35510b44@newukolbqveo9i> <115e7bd00609262102g4f5854edt2bde0914ddf3bc8c@mail.gmail.com>
 
thanks to all - I am leaning towards the D Lux 3 (Pan LX2) right now.
But then I saw this on http://tinyurl.com/gb42e
Which could be very interesting.
The foveon concept always seemend 'right' but never received good reviews.

Eric.


On 9/27/06, brad daly <bwdaly@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 9/23/06, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342@cox.net> wrote:
> > I've been enticed by:
> > http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06091408leicadlux3.asp
>
> i just bought one of those in its panasonic LX2 avatar.  the jury is still
> out.
>
> to wit: picture of miss patsy cline taken at ISO 3200, kinda noisy:
>
> http://static.flickr.com/86/253824890_72f4496843.jpg
>
> --brad
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from wrs111445 at yahoo.com (Bill Smith) ([Leica] digital replacement for Contax T? Sigma)
Reply from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?)
 In reply to: Message from faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman) ([Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?)
Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?)
Message from bwdaly at gmail.com (brad daly) ([Leica] digital replacement for Contax T?)