Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/10/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dave, Yes, my 2200 survived the heat, water and humidity of Katrina. It finally bit the dust a few months ago after 5 good years of service. Crane Silver Rag is printed with Photo Black as it is a "glossy" finish. Crane's website has the profile downloads. I print allot of 11x14's for weddings so I need the 13" printers. The Silver Rag finally allows for some great FB style BW prints. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Rodgers" Subject: RE: [Leica] Printing on Glossy Paper > Chris, > > I definitely considered the 2400. But I wanted a letter sized printer. I > just don't make that many large prints. I've owned an Epson 3000 for > quite some time. Still, most of what I printed was 8x10 and smaller. (It > was nice to be able to print the occasional 16x20, but I still can with > that). > > I like smaller prints. They're easier to frame. They show better. I also > sell photo cards, and those are folded letter size. Plus letter sized > printers are just easier to handle. > > I also print a lot of what I shoot in 4x6 and select images in 8x10. I > like looking at prints and I shuffle around new images. I tire of some > very quickly. Other prints grow on me. Size can make a difference. Some > images look better small. Some look better larger. IME it takes time to > judge an image. Viewing images on a monitor just isn't the same as > looking at prints. > > There really isn't a 2400 equivalent in letter size printer. The R800 > seemed to be the closest thing. All it lacks is light black inks. It's > possible to replace the GLOP and PK carts with light blacks and make BW > prints on matte papers with QTR. You can switch inks back for glossy, > similar to the 2400. I don't know how practical this is, or what the > drawbacks may be. I haven't tried this yet, but I will soon. (I like to > experiment, though I'd feel comfortable experimenting with the more > expensive 2400.) > > What really shocked me about the R800 is how good color glossy prints > looked. I've never been able to knock out decent color prints quickly > and economically on an ink jet printer. > > I've always had one printer for bw and one for color. Now I'm thinking > of having one for matte and one for glossy. > > BTW, I'm getting ready to order some Crane Silver Rag. Does you use > Photo Black or Matte Black ink? > > Sorry to hear about your 2200. Did you ever get it back? :-( > > daveR