Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2006/11/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] M8 in Palo Alto
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Sat Nov 11 19:59:48 2006
References: <6.1.0.6.2.20061111001133.07ff61d8@192.168.100.42> <20061111083100.7376.qmail@web56306.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <6.1.0.6.2.20061111150411.07c8ce20@192.168.100.42> <6043D831-2A8B-4168-BFFD-0A3BDBA868AF@comcast.net>
At 08:16 PM 11/11/2006, you wrote:
>One thing I don't get about these discussions re high ISO performance
>-- Why do you need more than 400 or 800 ISO with a Summilux or
>Noctilux?
>Tom Schofield
It's really, really dark in those adobe houses without
electricity. I often pushed TMax to 3200 and still used a Noctilux wide
open:
http://main.nc.us/openstudio/tinamanley/Honduras/amilcar.htm
http://main.nc.us/openstudio/tinamanley/Honduras/ordinand.htm
Tina
Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA
http://www.tinamanley.com
Replies:
Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] M8 in Palo Alto)
In reply to:
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] M8 in Palo Alto)
Message from pmcc_2000 at yahoo.com (pmcc) ([Leica] M8 in Palo Alto)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard) ([Leica] M8 in Palo Alto)
Message from leicaluvr at comcast.net (Tom Schofield) ([Leica] M8 in Palo Alto)