Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] KEH
From: rmcclure2 at woh.rr.com (Rob McClure)
Date: Thu Nov 16 20:22:13 2006
References: <001101c709ff$065ac170$4d45e344@GATEWAY>

I agree with Jeffery about KEH -- have bought much and never been 
disappointed.  If you are, they have a very lenient inspection/return 
period and even a warranty on most used items.  That's why I prefer to 
buy from them than that auction site that cannot be mentioned.  There 
prices are generally better, too.

Rob McClure
On Nov 16, 2006, at 11:15 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:

> They are very generous to the customer in this regard, but do take into
> account the age of the camera. Thus, an Ex+ Leica lens made within the 
> past
> 10 years will be like new, but an Ex+ Rolleiflex from 1955 won't be 
> quite so
> pristine. But I have never gotten anything from them that was lower 
> than
> their rating. I bought some Pentax 42 screwmount Takumars that look 
> like
> they were made yesterday.
>
> And if you aren't satisfied, you can return it for a refund.
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
> Philippe
> Orlent
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 6:26 PM
> To: LUG Group
> Subject: [Leica] KEH
>
>
> Are their descriptions and ratings for 2nd hand items trusteable?
>
> Thanks,
> Philippe
> \


Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] KEH)
In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] KEH)