Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/12/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] High ISOs Comparison
From: ericm at pobox.com (Eric)
Date: Thu Dec 7 16:53:15 2006
References: <20061206214243.BXP45425@ms03.lnh.mail.rcn.net> <A60E7CFF-A5DD-4A0E-BB3C-7324CEC5BBCA@comcast.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20061207080917.02807240@infoave.net> <43c3d48744166758eda769a953ddebaf@earthlink.net> <45782167.4010301@waltjohnson.com>

Walt:

>Wouldn't it  seem reasonable to test machines under the same conditions 
>to evaluate their performance. We could hand one PS oriented shooter a 
>Nikkormat and a less gifted one an M8. Not too valid a procedure for 
>checking camera capabilities. What you've suggested holds true for film 
>and software but not equipment.

I'm less concerned how cameras perform in a sterile lab, and more interested
in what results experts can obtain.

Would you test screws vs. nails by hammering both in?

I'd be interested to see differences in finished prints.  Using whatever
techniques are available to sharpen, reduce vignetting, and/or reduce noise.
Whatever is available is fair game.  I don't care about 100% pixel views.  I
care about how an 11x14 print looks from normal viewing distance.

I don't care about the sharpness of bricks or how many black and white lines
can be resolved.



--
Eric
http://canid.com/

Replies: Reply from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
In reply to: Message from larry.k at rcn.com (larry.k@rcn.com) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from xrogers at comcast.net (Clyde Rogers) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] High ISOs Comparison)