Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:LUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 549
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Thu Jan 11 18:01:34 2007
References: <200701111333.l0BDUUW5029716@server1.waverley.reid.org> <724FDD310638E147AD8E509D15FFB73183F47F@exchange.microassist.local> <3cad89990701110933ha6362dfkcd2c3db8ba8b61c@mail.gmail.com><F0F12715-84E4-43C4-8F7F-5D7EA351C8BE@mac.com> <45A6C57A.9030602@gmx.de>

Rumors of PMA 2007 are a Canon 40D and Mark III 12mp. No antishake rumors.

Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Douglas Sharp"Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: LUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 549


> George,
> I agree wholeheartedly, my even older 300D (D-Rebel) and my more recent 
> 20D are still working perfectly and deliver just what I want with a very 
> wide range of lenses, Leica, Zeiss, Rollei, Pentax - and even Canon 
> :-)    - the only thing that could make me upgrade to the successor of 
> the 5D (whatever it may be called when it comes out) is anti-shake and 
> automatic sensor cleaning (we live much too close to a cement works).
> Cheers
> Douglas



In reply to: Message from snasta at microassist.net (Sanjay Nasta) ([Leica] RE: LUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 549)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] RE: LUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 549)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] RE: LUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 549)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] RE: LUG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 549)