Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma
From: philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent)
Date: Sun Feb 11 09:56:24 2007
References: <3280493C-7263-4F11-BD0E-F63FE0ED2D6C@pandora.be> <007501c74d5d$979db1a0$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto>

Cheers Chris,
What did you drink then? ;-)
Philippe



Op 10-feb-07, om 22:51 heeft Christopher Williams het volgende  
geschreven:

> Philippe,
>
> I'm not a Canon owner and have not "embraced" Canon, but I have  
> used Canon dSLR's and lenses for work. I think you can almost do  
> anything with the 16-35/2.8 and 70-200/2.8 IS. I have also used the  
> 24-70/2.8 for portraits on a MkII with excellent results.
>
> Now if you think the "Leica one lens only" theory with Canon, you  
> may want to check out the 85/1.2. That's an amazing lens.
>
> For keeping just one Leica lens, I'd go with the 35/f2 'cron.
>
> Chris
>
> ps - I spent $30 on Belgium beer yesterday
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe Orlent"  
> <philippe.orlent@pandora.be>
> To: "LUG Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2007 1:13 PM
> Subject: [Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma
>
>
>> Since I won't be buying an M8, and waiting for an M9 -not being  
>> sure  if it will be worth all the bucks, and if it will be full  
>> sensor- is  not really an option, I have some decisions to make.
>> Digital has always been a bit on the side: not that I don't have  
>> good  digital cameras, but the ones that I have, have their  
>> quirkinesses.  Until now, that wasn't a problem, because most of  
>> the time that I was  really concentrating on photography, it was  
>> still an analog process.  But the beast of full digital has been  
>> roaring in my head for too  long now.
>> So I've come to the conclusion that, to keeps things simple and   
>> pleasant, digital is the way to go, even if my hearth still tends  
>> to  these mechanical beauties that were made in former eras.
>> I'll go the Canon 5D route, and I have almost decided on lenses, too.
>> I'm pretty sure that a lot of you switched to or embraced Canon,  
>> so  some first hand experiences would help to smoothen out the  
>> 'fear' for  the steep costs involved.
>>
>> What are your impressions of the following lenses?
>> Canon EF 24-70mm L f2.8 USM
>>
>> Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM
>>
>> Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8L USM
>>
>> And, if you'd only keep one lens on your analog M, which one  
>> would  that be?
>>
>> I was thinking of selling everything except for one good M body,  
>> and  then buying a Summilux 35 ASPH to glue on it forever. A  
>> perfect B&W  street dedicated machine, so to speak.
>>
>> Other -and wise(r)- suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re: not entirely OT: the recurrent dilemma)