Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The TO and CC fields
From: lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth)
Date: Thu Feb 15 11:57:08 2007

Well my second attempt with the LUG email address in the 'To' field got
through. I'd almost suggest that emails are being ignored if the lug address
is in the 'Cc' field - let's see.

Steve


On 15/2/07 19:45, "Wade Heninger" <heninger@adobe.com> wrote:

> Ok, I'm on the record as liking the reduced traffic.  But I'm not overly
> concerned if we went back to the old way, as I managed to read or delete
> without a problem.
> 
> That said, I'm confused as to how people don't understand if things will 
> get
> thru or not as if its some kind of "black magic" that powers email.
> 
> Just look at the To and CC lines. If "lug@leica-users.org" is there, it 
> will
> get to everyone. If it isn't, it won't.
> 
> It isn't rocket science.  No need to panic or beat yourself in angst with
> your least-used lens.
> 
> And I don't mean to insult anyone here, we're all smart as hell I'm  sure.
> 
> And I can understand not liking the fact that "reply" does not go to the 
> LUG
> automatically - it takes a bit more time to add it there if you deem it
> necessary - but there is something to the theory that maybe that reply
> shouldn't go to the whole group automatically.
> 
> But come on people, its not a black hole of confusion...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) ([Leica] The TO and CC fields)
In reply to: Message from heninger at adobe.com (Wade Heninger) ([Leica] The TO and CC fields)