Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Noctilux M8 question
From: faneuil at gmail.com (Eric Korenman)
Date: Fri Apr 20 12:25:06 2007
References: <565086AF-2D94-4C09-882E-FA942BB9D1C8@mac.com> <C24E882F.54528%mark@rabinergroup.com>

The whole point of the noctilux IS f/1.0
So don't worry about back focus issues at f/2.8

Eric

On 4/20/07, Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/20/07 10:57 AM, "Lottermoser George" <imagist3@mac.com> typed:
>
> > Thanks I'll put that on the downside column and hopefully save myself
> > $3+K.
> >
> > Regards,
> > George Lottermoser
> > george@imagist.com
> >
> >
> All I know is George when I got my Noctilux 8/28/2001 was that I was 
> worried
> my camera which hit the pavement several times might be a little about of
> wac at f1 or the newer TTL one might but guess what?
> I VERY SELDOM DIDN'T NAIL MY FOCUS.
> And I was an F1 and be there kind of guy with it.
> Blew up a bunch of shots 16x20 in the darkroom.
> Ted has had long experience with it. As have Tina.
> The thing just works. It was made by smart people. It works.
> Its a famous thing. If it had come congenital problem Erwin would have told
> us about it. Go get one. Just use the loose change in your back pocket. Go
> out and shoot with it. Leave your tape measures at home till its time to do
> home renewal.
>
>
>
>
> Mark Rabiner
> 8A/109s
> New York, NY
>
> markrabiner.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Noctilux M8 question)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Noctilux M8 question)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Noctilux M8 question)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Noctilux M8 question)