Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/06/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica M6/Tri-X vs. Ricoh GR-D and Leica D-Lux 3
From: glehrer at san.rr.com (Jerry Lehrer)
Date: Sun Jun 10 19:06:47 2007
References: <97DE284E-E575-4D86-A90D-0812E2542B05@mac.com>


Mitch,

Accepting grain or any other aberation as to being desired; is a perversion.

I may be different fromyou guys but I prefer the quality of a 4x5 negative.

Jerry


mitcha@mac.com wrote:
>> I've made plenty of darkroom C prints 40x60 inch from 35mm negs 
>> they're not a problem just as long as you don't put them next to a 
>> shot you took with a neg size more suited to those magnifications...
>
> Mark:
>
> I think you're overlooking artistic intent: it all depends what 
> aesthetic the photographer wants. In may case I don't want exquisite 
> medium-format prints: I want my photographs to have some "bite" or 
> grittiness.n Last year at the Sydney Biennale I saw a room with 60 
> Moriyama Daido prints, shot mostly on ISO 400 film with the Ricoh GR1 
> and GR21, printed on the Epson 9800 at 100x150cm (40x60 inches). They 
> were breathtaking. Had these prints been made from medium- or 
> large-format negatives they simply would have not been as great. One 
> size doesn't fit all, and not all of us want the "quality" of larger 
> negatives.
>
> --Mitch/Bangkok
>
>
>


Replies: Reply from leicam4pro at yahoo.com (John Biava) ([Leica] Leica M6/Tri-X vs. Ricoh GR-D and Leica D-Lux 3)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Leica M6/Tri-X vs. Ricoh GR-D and Leica D-Lux 3)
Reply from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Leica M6/Tri-X vs. Ricoh GR-D and Leica D-Lux 3)
In reply to: Message from mitcha at mac.com (mitcha@mac.com) ([Leica] Leica M6/Tri-X vs. Ricoh GR-D and Leica D-Lux 3)