Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] FS: Summicron 28
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Fri Jul 6 20:16:28 2007
References: <834995.63488.qm@web55908.mail.re3.yahoo.com><686DA471-C7AB-49CE-8BBA-853E5B08C317@charter.net><011301c7c041$1810a620$4831f260$@net> <B20DC374-CC6E-43BB-B9E9-11BD81DC3303@charter.net> <002701c7c042$d3f60a00$6601a8c0@asus930>

I've got a Noctilux floating out there some place also. It use to be  
Ernie's once.

Slobodan Dimitrov
Labor Images
http://www.sdimitrovphoto.com/





On Jul 6, 2007, at 7:59 PM, G Hopkinson wrote:

> Quite a LUG family connection on some of these lenses. I recently  
> "met" someone else's Nocti, many miles from home!
>
> Cheers
> Hoppy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org  
> [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On  
> Behalf Of
> Slobodan Dimitrov
> Sent: Saturday, 7 July 2007 12:50
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] FS: Summicron 28
>
> Didn't I sell you that lens?
>
> s.d.
>
>
>
> On Jul 6, 2007, at 7:46 PM, Jim Shulman wrote:
>
>> A few years ago the Viewfinder magazine ran a comparison of the
>> Summicron 28
>> and the CV 28/1.9.  They found (in conventional large prints) that
>> there was
>> no discernable difference from f 2.8 and smaller; at maximum
>> aperture the
>> Summicron was marginally (though this was disputed) sharper at the
>> edges.
>>
>> So, for Arche's purposes, the CV is probably just dandy.  Mine was a
>> terrific lens; I only sold it because I rarely used that focal  
>> length.
>>
>> Jim Shulman
>> Bryn Mawr, PA
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net@leica-users.org
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>> slobodan
>> dimitrov
>> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 9:54 PM
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] FS: Summicron 28
>>
>> Oh!
>> I forgot that people did that nowadays.
>> I guess even a coke bottle can produce enough resolution for much of
>> the scanning done these days.
>>
>> s.d.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] FS: Summicron 28)
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] FS: Summicron 28)
In reply to: Message from h_arche at yahoo.com (H. Ball Arche) ([Leica] FS: Summicron 28)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] FS: Summicron 28)
Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] FS: Summicron 28)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] FS: Summicron 28)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] FS: Summicron 28)