Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Negative price elasticity
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Fri Aug 31 10:12:24 2007
References: <200708311129.l7VBSa7F099401@server1.waverley.reid.org> <540F033D-4E68-4608-968F-755B5FF2E65D@optonline.net>
 
While your example may contain anecdotal truth; in far more cases  
than not; quality costs more due to better materials, better design,  
more time devoted to design, production and quality control; as well  
as the cost of transitioning the product from the manufacturer to the  
end user.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com



On Aug 31, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Lawrence Zeitlin wrote:

>  It has very little to do with inherent quality.
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: Negative price elasticity)