Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison
From: ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter)
Date: Sun Nov 4 16:51:21 2007
References: <000301c81ec6$9453b1d0$6401a8c0@asus930> <C3534798.7381C%mark@rabinergroup.com> <3e7573d40711040703q2f4b2cfdmaddcf72c15f23d6a@mail.gmail.com> <3DF4C0F7-0AA2-45F5-B7CF-B865FDE63F5F@comcast.net>
 
too funny!

how long did you have to work on that?

;^)

ric


On Nov 4, 2007, at 7:17 PM, Tom Schofield wrote:

> When they finally make the 75-90-135 Tri-Tele-Elmar I have been  
> advocating for years, we can call that one the TITEE.  Maybe they  
> will sell them in matched sets. ;-)
Replies: Reply from tomschofield at comcast.net (Tom Schofield) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
 In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from leowesson at gmail.com (leo wesson) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)
Message from tomschofield at comcast.net (Tom Schofield) ([Leica] 16-16-15 lens comparison)