Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/11/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits
From: leica1 at robsteve.com (Robert G. Stevens)
Date: Mon Nov 19 16:53:24 2007
References: <4740C660.9010507@wanadoo.nl> <6af76ca00711191253v423fd54duf026364ad5dab8de@mail.gmail.com> <BD743099-A9E9-473C-B069-AB6083A5AE11@charter.net> <9A252848-82A0-4121-A856-3EFEA714FE04@cox.net> <47421421.4090502@wanadoo.nl> <aed41d690711191633q7bbb5d1cr10149dc80b5f8948@mail.gmail.com>
At 08:33 PM 11/19/2007, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>Sometimes I wish he was more descriptive with his reviews.
I always liked his very technical descriptions of simple things like
size. In his 35-70mm f2.8 review he states the 2.8 version has twice
the volume of the f4 version, rather than just saying it is twice the size.
Robert
Replies:
Reply from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)
In reply to:
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)
Message from crbirchenhall at googlemail.com (Christopher Birchenhall) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Erwin Puts tests the summarits)