Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: The D3 and ISO 25600
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Thu Dec 6 16:59:10 2007
References: <C37D0A6E.79855%mark@rabinergroup.com><1FCF4380-7252-412D-9FBE-A7744EACB16F@ciudad.com.ar><D2BC4781-3E54-4125-A503-92B11457465E@comcast.net> <302611a60712061639v64c117d3we0d1067f0768a8b1@mail.gmail.com>
 
You found someone to trade your D200 for a D300? Do they want another D200? 
What a deal :)

I have 1600iso D200 16x20's, while noisy they do almost look like film grain 
- almost. Many pre-D300/D3 noise complaints I've seen 
are from underexposed images. My D2h is not great at high iso's but if the 
image is exposed right it's very usable. The D300 1600iso 
is something all together new for Nikon users.

Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Allen Graves" Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: The D3 and ISO 25600


>I just traded my D200 for a D300. ISO 3200 on it seems about as good as ISO
> 800 on the D200. I never found anything beyond ISO 800 useable on the D200
> for anything more than 4x6. I'll try to put together a more formal
> comparison (though the D200 is gone- ran into a guy who wanted it more than
> I wanted it).It certainly seems that for once Nikon has payed attention to
> what photographers want.
>
> Allen
Replies: Reply from allen.graves at charter.net (Allen Graves) ([Leica] OT: The D3 and ISO 25600)
Reply from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] OT: The D3 and ISO 25600)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] ISO 1600)
Message from eduardoalbesi at ciudad.com.ar (Eduardo Albesi) ([Leica] OT: The D3 and ISO 25600)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] OT: The D3 and ISO 25600)
Message from allen.graves at charter.net (Allen Graves) ([Leica] OT: The D3 and ISO 25600)