Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/12/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Thu Dec 13 10:38:17 2007
References: <002e01c83d7b$d40617e0$6400a8c0@corp.nortel.com> <43947DDB653551B8C85FD332@hindolveston.reid.org> <00c601c83db1$fe075be0$fa1613a0$@net>
Not all of us M8 users consider it a "major faulty decision."
I love the increased fine image detail.
I love the M8's ability to create true IR images, or not, by my
choice of filters.
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
On Dec 13, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Frank Filippone wrote:
> Note: the M9 will undoubtedly fix this major faulty decision on
> Leica's part
> and have the correct filter coverage on the sensor.....
Replies:
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
In reply to:
Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
Message from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Consensus (? on LUG) on IR filters on M8)