Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/01/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica]The new T-Max 400
From: jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Wed Jan 9 18:05:19 2008
References: <30BB23E1-3745-4501-92DF-ED90843A2720@cox.net> <47852436.1030307@waltjohnson.com> <F43DE963-E72A-465F-92A7-8909C31A5285@cox.net> <47852C85.5080207@waltjohnson.com> <00e101c85317$306863c0$0200a8c0@robertbxucevjs> <8455dfa10801091702o4f1e2a14p9d98ce105909ff1@mail.gmail.com> <015c01c85329$a0c049a0$0200a8c0@robertbxucevjs> <aed41d690801091746r1402cc90w86e8db5d2cc1fd55@mail.gmail.com> <C2117952-9EA0-4BE7-ABC8-677F56CA6006@comcast.net>
 
Sharper and finer-grained than BW400CN? That is saying a lot!!

On Jan 9, 2008 7:53 PM, Leonard Taupier <len-1@comcast.net> wrote:

> All the info on the improved film is here.
>
> <http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/bw/
> tMax400.jhtml?id=0.2.26.14.17.14&lc=en>
>
> or
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yun427
>
> Len
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2008, at 8:46 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>
> > I hope its latitude is more forgiving.
> >
> > On Jan 9, 2008 7:39 PM, Robert Meier <robertmeier@usjet.net> wrote:
> >
> >> No, it is not C-41.
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "parker haeg" <leica68@gmail.com>
> >> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 7:07 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [Leica]The new T-Max 400
> >>
> >>
> >>> The editor makes note of it in this month's Shutterbug "letter
> >>> from the
> >>> editor".  It sounds very interesting and I can't wait to try it.
> >>> Is it supposed to be a c-41?
> >>>
> >>> On 1/9/08, Robert Meier <robertmeier@usjet.net> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Has anyone gotten ahold of any of the new T-Max 400?  B&H tells me
> >> their
> >>>> purchasing agent doesn't know anything about it!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> >>>> information
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jeffery L. Smith
> > New Orleans, LA
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Jeffery L. Smith
New Orleans, LA
Replies: Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:The new T-Max 400)
Reply from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
 In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] IMG my left foot...)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from leica68 at gmail.com (parker haeg) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica]The new T-Max 400)