Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Reductionism isn't legit OT
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Sat Feb 2 08:15:42 2008
References: <C3C94C60.88813%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
I reckon you'll want to look into removable backs and/or sheet film -  
both of which did give us great choice options on a per frame basis ;~)

On Feb 1, 2008, at 9:23 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> If the next roll of  Tri X I get is incrementally coated so at the  
> beginning
> its ASA 50 and at the end of the roll its ASA 3200 and you can get  
> cameras
> with little micro motors and memories so you can dial in what ASA  
> or ISO you
> want to for each shot and the film goes shooting to that area that  
> would
> sure get me excited about running out and getting a roll of Tri x!!!!!

Fond regards,
George
george@imagist.com
www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
Picture A Week - www.imagist.com/paw_07
Replies: Reply from rsphotoimages at comcast.net (Bob Shaw) ([Leica] Reductionism isn't legit OT)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Reductionism isn't legit OT)