Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: IMG: New TMax400 film evaluation.
From: len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier)
Date: Sat Feb 16 07:26:16 2008
References: <42A644C1-57E3-48E1-810C-5F39A7DAD2A8@comcast.net> <200802160951.36236.Platoali@gmail.com>

Ali,

Now I see the problem. Kodaks tech notes F4016 and F4043 contradict  
one another. F4043 does say 9 1/4 minutes. I will try that on my next  
roll. It should increase the contrast.

Len


On Feb 16, 2008, at 1:21 AM, Platoali wrote:

> On Shanbe 27 Bahman 1386, Leonard Taupier wrote:
>>
>> Both films were developed in Xtol 1+1 for 8 3/4 minutes at 68 F.
>> Agitation in the developer is constant for the first 30 seconds and
>> then 5 seconds every 30 seconds. The negatives were scanned with a
>> Nikon Coolscan 9000. Except for cropping there was no post processing
>> at all. What you see is how they came out of the scanner.
>>
>
>
> I did read on the kodak site that the development time is somhow  
> different
> from the old one. I saw on the techdoc, that the proccess time  
> should be
> about 9 1/4 min for xtol 1+1.
>
> http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/support/techPubs/f4043/ 
> f4043.pdf?id=0.2.26.14.17.14.18&lc=en
> http://tinyurl.com/2fnud8
>
> If I'm wrong, please correct me.
>
> Best regards
> Ali
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] IMG: New TMax400 film evaluation.)
Message from platoali at gmail.com (Platoali) ([Leica] Re: IMG: New TMax400 film evaluation.)