Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Square format
From: leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig)
Date: Wed Feb 27 16:51:27 2008
References: <200802261007.m1QA7ZIr037742@mail.imagecraft.com> <47C3C9BB.25963.342BC6@leica.rcmckee.com> <872FD193-CC61-4507-822C-62647BD52BFA@mindspring.com>

You like vertical format? And you like it big? Then this is your camera:
http://tinyurl.com/37wyza 
;-)
Didier



>I don't know, or have forgotten, the origins of our current "standard"  
>formats for photos. It seems that 6X6 cm is the only "common" square  
>standard.
>
>Did this perhaps come from the difficulty of rotating cameras to go  
>from horizontal to vertical?
>
>While it might waste silver, the square could easily let you punch out  
>the 2:3 ratio (4X6 or 6X4) as a vertical or horizontal without having  
>to try to tip your TLR over on its side. The old folders were much  
>more convenient vertical than horizontal, also.
>
>After all, a square composition will end up wasting silver on the  
>print. I don;t remember ever seeing square format printing paper. It  
>certainly was not common.
>
>Ric Carter 

Replies: Reply from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Square format)
In reply to: Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Wow, are the Mamiya as cool as the HASSELbald?)
Message from leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] Wow, are the Mamiya as cool as the HASSELbald?)
Message from ricc at mindspring.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Square format)