Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/03/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Not buying a Hummer
From: raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K)
Date: Tue Mar 11 09:28:01 2008
References: <a3f189160803102237q52ddae81u8161a4e0b81bda2d@mail.gmail.com> <aed41d690803110435j4102af34ib852cf4bdfb9762b@mail.gmail.com> <001301c8836c$fecbb9d0$6b01a8c0@dadquad>

Heh!
And these were originally designed for military use.
All the best! Raimo

Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
> The local Corrective Services folks (this state in AU) bought a bunch of
> them to patrol the perimeters, I guess. Finally they gave up as they were
> unable to keep the vehicles functional and sold them off for something
> locally less exotic!
> I can never think Hummers without thinking Blackhawk Down, or have you guys
> not seen it?
>
> Cheers
> Geoff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Not buying a Hummer
>
> Good idea. I have heard that those Hummers break down often, and it is
> a bitch to get their customer service people on the phone. One could
> start believing that they have no customer service, at least in the
> US. Word has it that you have to actually contact the president of
> Hummer North America (or is it Hummer USA) before they will dignify
> your service needs with a response.
>
> They ought to come out with a Hummer Perpetual Edition. It would cost
> thousands more, but after paying those thousands, they will return
> your emails and not have their secretary say "He just stepped away
> from the desk" ten times a day when you call.
>
> The perpetual Hummer. Someone should fire a CEO for such an idea. But
> if you're cash-strapped, charging thousands of dollars for the
> courtesy of answering an email or phone call just seems financially
> sound.
>
> Jeffery "Shutter Fault" Smith (or is it Jeffery "Engine Fault" Smith?)
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:37 AM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr@gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> I've decided not to trade the Prius for a Hummer.
>>  I want a vehicle that is recognizable , kind of like my M8 camera is.  So
>>     
> I
>   
>>  thought maybe I'd look at the Hummer SUV.
>>  It is  boxy and wide, and a rugged vehicle originally built for military
>>  use.
>>
>>  These  rock-crawlers look like  tanks on the road , and that's not a
>>     
> flaw.
>   
>>  Well, it seems that the Prius might be somewhat more friendly to the
>>  environment.  At least that's what I think after filling my ten gallon
>>     
> gas
>   
>>  tank, and the guy at the next pump was hitting $85 bucks as I drove away.
>>
>>  Someone will pick this apart in about three posts.  But I like my M8, and
>>     
> I
>   
>>  really hate being in the darkroom, and I am in denial at how to file
>>  negatives from 1962.
>>
>>  Good luck all you darkroom freaks. Smell your fingers and wonder why
>>     
> people
>   
>>  shy away from you in public.. look at that plastic apron and when you see
>>  what the stuff does to an inert fabric wonder what it is doing to your
>>  lungs.
>>
>>  The first miracle in my life was seeing a print coming up in the
>>     
> developer.
>   
>>  The second was seeing my  first kid hanging upside down in the OB's
>>     
> grasp.
>   
>>  IHow did I afford an M8?  I sold two hard-earned M7's and a couple
>>     
> lenses.
>   
>>  It was completely worth it.  I love this camera.
>>
>>  I'll also keep the Prius.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>>  Regards,
>>
>>  Sonny
>>  http://www.sonc.com
>>  Natchitoches, Louisiana
>>  USA
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Leica Users Group.
>>  See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   



In reply to: Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Not buying a Hummer)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Not buying a Hummer)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Not buying a Hummer)