Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Leica Street Photography
From: socphoto at verizon.net (Carl Socolow)
Date: Tue Jul 15 19:35:35 2008

Emanuel,

I have to disagree with your regulations. They may have some merit when one 
is learning things like rules but, as with most rules (and particularly 
rules having to do with aesthetics), they are only waypoints on the road to 
personal style and expression.

If you look at the nude woman in Manet's Dejeuner sur l'Herbe she's looking 
at the viewer. Why should Manet be able to get away with this and not a 
photographer? Where was it written or decreed that the camera is always 
supposed to be the omniscient, third-person observer or which the subject is 
unawares? For that matter who says photographs have to be sharp? We become 
slaves to the technology because we've been indoctrinated by the marketing 
and the MTF charts to think that this lens is sharper than that lens. I 
think it was Stieglitz's New York City winter snow scene with the horse that 
is breathtakingly unsharp. Getting back to subject/camera eye contact, 
Cartier-Bresson's photo of the tranvestites doing each other's hair has them 
looking at the camera as does Robert Franks cross-dressers (or whatever they 
are) in The Americans where the one is holding his hand in front of his 
face. So, too, with HCB's portrait of Ezra Pound looking at the camera 
although that is a portrait and subject to its own set of definitions.

These are ones that come immediately to my mind. Thanks for sharing your 
opinion, though.

Carl Sander Socolow

Emanuel wrote:

Message: 7
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:35:07 -0400
From: EPL <manolito@videotron.ca>
Subject: [Leica] Re: Leica Street Photography
To: lug@leica-users.org
Message-ID: <C4A2904B.2BFB%manolito@videotron.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

I dislike most photos where the person is looking at the photographer, into
the lens. To do so violates the theory of 4th wall removal which governs
theatre. 

It only works when the face is truly extraordinary, a surprise, like
McCurry's Afghan girl with the piercing world-weary green eyes.

But I also much prefer to see the white of at least one eye, and both are
better. Adds immeasurably to the alive-ness of the subject. Otherwise, poses
seem lifelessly statuesque.                     

Emanuel


-- 
Carl Sander Socolow
Socolow Photography
www.carlsandersocolow.com
www.socphoto.com


Inventing the unknown calls for new forms.
   A. Rimbaud


Confidentiality Note: The information contained in this email and 
document(s) attached are for the exclusive use of the addressee and may 
contain confidential, privileged and non-disclosable information. If the 
recipient of this email is not the addressee, such recipient is strictly 
prohibited from reading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this 
email or its contents in any way.