Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Natan, I understand. I agree that the lens quality is very important and Leica do it superbly. I was adding that the M8 is the only game in town for digital rangefinder photography ;-) On the M8 sensor, my personal experience is that it captures more detail and dynamic range than I can achieve with my Nikon scanner and the best pro slide film from my M7 with the same glass. That's a comparison that you can only appreciate when you first shoot that way. I long thought that I would be giving up image quality. That only lasted until I first saw M8 images enlarged on my screen and in print. The advantages of shooting Raw are so compelling as to make the whole comparison moot anyway. But that is a different subject perhaps. Regarding the firmware, I applaud the Leica approach of less processing and more emphasis on maximum original quality. That might describe M photography in general too. I acknowledge that there is enormously clever processing going on in DSLRs of many types. Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/ -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [Leica] How to get an M8 for $3200... But that was not my point, Geoff. Sure, there are no other digital rangefinders at the moment. But we could be having the same discussion in the context of the DMR, which also delivers superb results for those who have it. My point was rather that I have the suspicion that the quality of the Leica digital images has nothing to do with the sensor or software, but rather with the lenses. The same superb lenses delivered excellent quality on film and they continue to deliver excellent quality on sensors--indeed, even on Canon or Olympus sensors! I guess what I am trying to say is that with digital, as well as with film before, the quality of the lens matters a great deal, IMO more than the sensor or the software. Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog On Jul 24, 2008, at 9:04 AM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote: > Natan, Leica is the acknowledged world leader in digital rangefinder > cameras > too! If you love using rangefinders cameras, you acknowledge the > quality of > the Leica lenses, you wish to work with digital capture and you want > state > of the art (some might say bleeding edge) it is spelt M8 ;-) > > > Cheers > Geoff > http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/ > > -----Original Message----- > > Subject: Re: [Leica] How to get an M8 for $3200... > > But then I wonder how much of that difference is due to the difference > in sensor/software configurations (an area in which Leica has no > particular competitive advantage) vs. difference in lens quality > between the Leica M and Canon lenses (an area in which Leica is the > acknowledged world leader). > > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > On Jul 22, 2008, at 6:00 AM, Tina Manley wrote: > >> At 07:07 PM 7/21/2008, you wrote: >>> My 5D image files can not come close to the M8 image files in terms >>> of fine detail, color and shadow detail. >>> George >> >> I agree! >> >> Tina >> >> >> Tina Manley >> www.tinamanley.com