Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/10/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?
From: dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Mon Oct 20 10:03:14 2008
References: <48FC7AE2.3020300@sympatico.ca> <a2f8f4470810200605i3605f53en140fe46c4a819732@mail.gmail.com> <48FCB734.9070909@tele2.fr>

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Philippe AMARD <philippe.amard@tele2.fr> 
wrote:
> I once upon a time  hit upon a hell of a lot of K25 out of date rolls for a
> penny each - with the yellow cloth bag type for those who remember.
> This was my second best experience in my photographic life, after digital
> photography, with regards to wallet issues.
>
> And I learned a lot then.
> Use them, and don't complain if they fail.
> But use them to try things you wouldn't have otherwise.
> My two cents

I value my photographs. I don't take unnecessary risks.

If I was shooting tree-bark, any old film would do.

Daniel

Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)