Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/10/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] ... and Some Thoughts on the M3
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Thu Oct 30 14:20:24 2008
References: <370105078.1342501225386721152.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu> <24709389.1342711225386756932.JavaMail.root@mail02.pantherlink.uwm.edu>

That would be add the 1.25 or new 1.4 magnification eyepiece. I can't help
you with the money part ;-) 


Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
Maike Harbets speaks on the S2. .... So we will drop down this technology to
our other systems.
Our priority is to modernise the R system which will be in the end an R10,
definitely.

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008 03:13
To: lug
Subject: Re: [Leica] ... and Some Thoughts on the M3

On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:15:13 -0400
 "Richard S. Taylor" <r.s.taylor_post@comcast.net> wrote:

>Good man, Alan.  Wish I had the patience to deal with film on a   
>regular basis.  The primary result of my having used the M3 was to   
>create a desire in me to go buy an M8, which I am trying mightily to   
>squelch.  :-)
____________________________________________________________
Well, if it's any consolation, the last time I looked through an M8 finder,
it seemed harder to focus than my M3.  I've never liked the VF of the M2 or
later models as much.  (If I had the money) I'd like to have a digital Leica
with the M3 viewfinder magnification.

Alan

Alan Magayne-Roshak, Senior Photographer UPAA POY 1978 University
Information Technology Services University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Alan+Magayne-Roshak/

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from amr3 at uwm.edu (Alan Magayne-Roshak) ([Leica] ... and Some Thoughts on the M3)