Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/02/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re:Monster High-tech 50mm 1.4 from Sigma and everyone else
From: sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner)
Date: Thu Feb 5 08:56:18 2009
References: <C5AF7438.496FA%mark@rabinergroup.com><D18403D5-38CE-4E8D-8AEF-C1AE284E731B@verizon.net><4994DCEDD0D24F6FBB6D096706FCDE7D@D1S9FY41> <0408F205-01DB-4771-AEED-8E164E8F6F63@btinternet.com>

Whew! I feel better already, Frank!    :-)

though not better enough to sell any of my 1960's-70's Leitz lenses. 
;-)

Seth

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Frank Dernie" <Frank.Dernie@btinternet.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Monster High-tech 50mm 1.4 from Sigma and everyone 
else


> Hi Seth,
> If the part is correctly manufactured to the drawing it is the design
> which determines the reliability, quality and longevity, not the place
> of manufacture. Nowadays machines are generally sufficiently accurate
> to produce parts which need no or minimal selective assembly. If items
> are properly inspected there should be no concern.
> FWIW the Nikon lenses of the 70s were notoriously variable from sample
> to sample.
> Frank
>
> On 5 Feb, 2009, at 14:19, Seth Rosner wrote:
>
>> Hoooo! I'm so out-of-it that I wasn't aware that Nikon (and
>> others???) are now manufacturing in China. I wonder how that gear
>> will perform decades from now. What depth of experience and know-how
>> in this field do the Chinese have - no disrespect intended for they
>> have mega-experience in some areas.
>>
>> My 90/2,8 Elmarit is 35 years old, the 35/2,8 Summaron is 42 and the
>> 50/2 DR Summicron is 44, not even discussing the IIIc/IIIf
>> conversion (60+ years old!!!) and its lenses. And they all function
>> flawlessly and at world-class levels.
>>
>> Of course, for me it doesn't really matter since there is some
>> reasonable doubt that I'll be around 40 years from now! at least not
>> as fully functional as my Leica gear      :-(
>>
>> What it does illustrate is how manufacturers, Leica Camera and
>> perhaps others (Carl Zeiss & Schneider-Kreuznach Deutschland?)
>> excluded, regard their wares as throw- away stuff, expensive throw-
>> away but throw-away nonetheless. Not my kind of world.
>>
>> Seth
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.17/1934 - Release Date: 02/04/09 
08:24:00


Replies: Reply from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Re:Monster High-tech 50mm 1.4 from Sigma and everyone else)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re:Monster High-tech 50mm 1.4 from Sigma and everyone else)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Re:Monster High-tech 50mm 1.4 from Sigma and everyone else)
Message from len-001 at verizon.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] Re:Monster High-tech 50mm 1.4 from Sigma and everyone else)
Message from sethrosner at nycap.rr.com (Seth Rosner) ([Leica] Re:Monster High-tech 50mm 1.4 from Sigma and everyone else)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] Re:Monster High-tech 50mm 1.4 from Sigma and everyone else)