Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Test Zeiss Jena Sonnar 2/85
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:39:19 +0100
References: <7A64EA9E-EAF6-42EB-844D-BF6E8199FA3C@telefonica.net> <22D18278-DD60-4FB5-874D-A8130A3220BE@embarqmail.com> <49C69FE6.4020701@tele2.fr> <8994A828-6018-427B-AB2B-311E06F3B713@telefonica.net>

Ah, les 400 coups ....
Superbes photos en tout cas.

Your neighbour,
Philippe



Lluis Ripoll wrote:

> Hi Philippe,
>
> Thank you for your comments, but the probem appeared on the M3 not on  
> the M8, as said I should more test.
>
> The kids running is in a School close to the MACBA, it has a  
> completely old style as I like to find and catch for my scenes "400  
> coups style"...
>
> Amiti?s du sud de Metz!
> Lluis
>
>
> El 22/03/2009, a las 21:30, Philippe AMARD escribi?:
>
>> Dampness - condensed water - frost ?
>> every option is open here.
>> even a dirty sensor ;-)
>> Love the last one - reminds me of the good ol' days ' running to  
>> school - wish I still could
>> Amiti?s du nord de la Catalogne Lluis
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>>
>> Ric Carter wrote:
>>
>>> I get a similar problem with the 35mm on my Nikonos, though not  always
>>>
>>> don't know what causes it, though I have wondered about the front   
>>> glass of the underwater lens causing some light bouncing around
>>>
>>> were you using a filter?
>>>
>>> ric
>>>
>>> On Mar 21, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've tested the lens on the M3 with TX at 400 ISO, I was veru   
>>>> surprised to appreciate a certain flare on the center of the   
>>>> negative, aybe it was simply that lens was dirty, the lens has no   
>>>> signs of coating deterioration at all, maybe is a slight  
>>>> reflection  of light due to the adaptor adjustement on the camera,  
>>>> the case is  that the first picture could be in my opinion a good  
>>>> catch but I've  can improve it, I  would like know your opinions,  
>>>> thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8813763
>>>>
>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8813764
>>>>
>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8813762
>>>>
>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8813761
>>>>
>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=8813760
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for looking and your comments,
>>>>
>>>> Saludos cordiales
>>>> Lluis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Test Zeiss Jena Sonnar 2/85)
Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Test Zeiss Jena Sonnar 2/85)
Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] Test Zeiss Jena Sonnar 2/85)
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Test Zeiss Jena Sonnar 2/85)