Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 8 or 8.2
From: jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier)
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 20:34:09 -0600
References: <p06230901c621565c282b@10.0.1.199> <36172e5a0905011932k698ebe99wc1f7ab55f51100aa@mail.gmail.com>

I prefer the M8 framelines as they are the same as all my film Ms,

John

On 1-May-09, at 8:32 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> Henning, the frame line difference is personal preference, I'm sure.  
> As is
> the importance of the 1/8000 setting and the quieter shutter. Yours  
> is the
> first expressed preference for the M8 frame lines over the M8.2 that  
> I have
> read. As you say, you adjust to what you have. 'More accurate  
> framelines'
> from me was just meant to indicate the different setup. I guess I  
> need to
> choose my words more carefully ;-)
> Leica presumably was responding to expressed preferences when they  
> changed
> to the new arrangement.
> I wish that they would run the discounted upgrade programme over  
> here. I
> guess this is a Leica USA initiative? In Aus an M8.2 new is double the
> (discounted) price of the M8 new now. Any M8 service at all and any  
> upgrade
> all goes to Solms.
>
> 2009/5/2 Henning Wulff <henningw at archiphoto.com>
>
>> Goes to show that personal preferences are what count. I'd pay  
>> maybe $5
>> more for an M8.2, figuring that the pluses of the 8.2 pretty much  
>> balance
>> the lack of 1/8000sec.
>>
>> To add to that. The 'more accurate framelines' belong to the M8, as  
>> that
>> shows what you get at minimum focus. The 8.2 framelines show what  
>> you get
>> between minimum and infinity.
>>
>> For accurate framing I like a view camera or a digital P&S or dslr  
>> with
>> LiveView. With the M8, like any other Leica RF, you get used to the
>> parameters, and then work with that.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> At 6:07 PM -0500 5/1/09, David Keenan wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any REALLY good reason to pass on an M8 demo and
>>>> hold out for the 8.2?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ric --
>>>
>>> Good gawd yes.
>>>
>>> Unless you want to take advantage of the 1/2 price M8->M8.2  
>>> upgrade from
>>> Leica (for $1025) and order a better covering from CameraLeather  
>>> or have
>>> Leica put one on for you.
>>>
>>> As many remember, I thought the M8 was a disaster. The M8.2 is  
>>> what the M8
>>> should have been. It is really a splendid camera and so close to  
>>> my M7s in
>>> operation that I often forget that I'm taking a digital picture.
>>>
>>> .
>>> Dave.
>>>
>>> --
>>
>>  *            Henning J. Wulff
>> /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>> /###\   mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com
>> |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Cheers
> Geoff
> 'Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On'
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] 8 or 8.2)
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] 8 or 8.2)