Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/07/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] To Sell or Not to Sell now Canon CA and Leica
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:09:41 -0500
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36052E965F@case-email.casefoods.com> <97FFA535-F96B-4E90-B7A7-FCBC9FA4F900@mac.com> <7ac27f4f0907021154p1f82af09p592100f45119024c@mail.gmail.com> <3AFBDD9F-8BC3-4ECD-8082-CB1798DAECC4@mac.com> <200907021942.BRM18147@rg4.comporium.net>

Quite so - generally my approach -
yet
relatively noise free 1600 and 3200
and with fast glass
continues to have
an attractive holy grail ring to it
;~)

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Jul 2, 2009, at 2:42 PM, Tina Manley wrote:

> At 03:39 PM 7/2/2009, you wrote:
>> I've not heard of a CCD back or camera which does as well in the high
>> ISO realm.
>>
>> trade-off?
>> need one of each?
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>
> How about just fast Leica lenses instead ;-) I never needed  
> anything higher than TMax 400 pushed to 800 when I was using film  
> and fast lenses.
>
> Tina
>
> Tina Manley
> www.tinamanley.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] To Sell or Not to Sell now Canon CA and Leica)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] To Sell or Not to Sell now Canon CA and Leica)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] To Sell or Not to Sell now Canon CA and Leica)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] To Sell or Not to Sell now Canon CA and Leica)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] To Sell or Not to Sell now Canon CA and Leica)