[Leica] M9 - not much more expensive than M8?

[richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)]

I know, but my assessment differs. Of course the 35/1.4 ASPH is MUCH
better than the 12-60 at F1.4 :-), but otherwise the Olympus holds up
quite well.

and yes, before Mark asks, this is at print level. But again, to each
of their own. The M8 is in a class by itself, that's for sure.

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Nathan Wajsman<photo at frozenlight.eu> 
wrote:
> It is not a subjective perception, Richard, but an objective assessment. I
> have an E3 too, with two of the best lenses in the E system, the 12-60 and
> the 50-200. So I am not knocking the E3 by any means, but it is simply not
> in the M8+Leica lenses league. And indeed it would not be reasonable to
> expect it to be, given the price difference in lenses.
>




-- 
// richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
// w: http://www.imagecraft.com/pub/Portfolio09/ blog:
http://rfman.wordpress.com
// book: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/745963