Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Forum
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:16:03 -0700
References: <E5A71BF5-0778-4F3C-A705-25D495B64EDC@gmail.com> <36172e5a0909281605m4929226aw18031b284bced218@mail.gmail.com> <62899896469753564415363436494067461882-Webmail@me.com> <36172e5a0910010334h27d9e599s6689b89882ac7b84@mail.gmail.com> <01d001ca4285$7a64cb30$6f2e6190$@net> <36172e5a0910010711n77e01f69pc1b357b30d2a0ead@mail.gmail.com>

On Oct 1, 2009, at 7:11 AM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:

> Just my personal addendum Jim.
> Personally I AM an advocate of Leica content in the LUG and Yearbook.
> However I recognise that I am in a minority.  I'm not sure that  
> "virtually
> all" are not is correct though!
> I'll contribute again this year FWIW but I'm flummoxed why books  
> full of
> Leica photographs from many of the best in the LUG (my alternatives  
> not
> replacements for your compilations) attract almost zero interest in
> comparison.

seems... that people will buy a book if their photos are in it...


> Very different approaches certainly.
> I'm even shooting 6x7  transparencies in a Voigtlander currently,  
> but they
> won't make it onto the LUG. I like that LU part.
> As a practical matter, that is the nature of the LUG and a pre- 
> condition
> when enjoying the society of many talented photographers here.
> Sometimes I even enjoy the non-Leica content ;-) Sssh.
> In Leica specific context Solms staff that I have spoken with of  
> course see
> it differently (unsurprisingly).
> 2009/10/1 Jim Shulman <jshul at comcast.net>
>
>> Scott,
>>
>> Geoff is right--for virtually all the members of this group, Leica  
>> is a
>> subset of a wider photographic interest.  Most of us have a broad  
>> variety
>> of
>> cameras, some of which are not Leica (or fully Leica) when a great  
>> picture
>> presents itself.
>>
>> That's the main reason why I opened up the LUG yearbook to LUG  
>> members who
>> may or may not be shooting Leicas--personally, I'd rather see  
>> participation
>> with a person's best images, rather than a self-exclusion because  
>> they
>> didn't happen to have a Leica at that moment, or wouldn't care to  
>> share
>> their Leica-produced images.
>>
>> Many years ago I belonged (briefly) to a local camera club.  They  
>> invited
>> people to bring in images, and then the images were subjected to a
>> three-person judging panel, who issued Olympics-like ratings via some
>> electronic clicker system.  The scene was absurd enough to become  
>> one of my
>> pictures <g>.
>>
>> At that point I decided that I preferred photography to be more  
>> inclusive,
>> rather than less. Thus, the philosophy for the book.  About the only
>> restriction on the publication is that we accept only images made  
>> during
>> this year.  Presumably, as Leica/camera users, rather than just  
>> collectors,
>> we're out shooting.
>>
>> Incidentally, with the advent of the M8 (and now M9) the number of
>> Leica-produced images in the yearbook has been increasing, proving (I
>> suppose) that when Leica produces great, current technology tools
>> photographers will avidly use them.
>>
>> Only two more shooting months until the next yearbook begins!
>>
>> Best,
>> Jim Shulman
>> Wynnewood, PA
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net at leica-users.org
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+jshul <lug-bounces%2Bjshul>=comcast.net@
>> leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Geoff
>> Hopkinson
>> Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 6:34 AM
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Forum
>>
>> No longer exclusively though Scott. That is how the LUG has  
>> evolved. Leica
>> interest is a sub-set of photography interest in general for many LUG
>> members. Jim's project has been very successful and popular as you  
>> note.
>> There ARE some books available from LUG members with exclusively  
>> Leica
>> content if you like to have some alternatives also on your shelf ;-)
>>
>> 2009/10/1 Scott Gregory <s_gregory1 at mac.com>
>>
>>> I've always wondered why the LUG does not use only Leica  
>>> Photographs for
>>> their yearly book. After all, it is Leica interest that brings the  
>>> group
>>> together, I thought. NOT in any way to diminish the fine efforts  
>>> of Jim
>>> Shulman, but just asking??
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers
>> Geoff
>> The new LEICA M9
>> Passion for perfect pictures.
>> http://www.m.leica-camera.com
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Cheers
> Geoff
> The new LEICA M9
> Passion for perfect pictures.
> http://www.m.leica-camera.com
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] Leica Forum)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Leica Forum)
Message from s_gregory1 at mac.com (Scott Gregory) ([Leica] Leica Forum)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Leica Forum)
Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] Leica Forum)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Leica Forum)