Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:04:09 -0700
References: <27649946.1256005943935.JavaMail.root@wamui-haziran.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <5D25120D-E811-443E-9F27-F57DB6864979@gmail.com> <D94F37E3-6BEB-42B6-B4BF-68552FA6F3CC@frozenlight.eu> <016501ca513f$1fc4a150$5f4de3f0$@net> <9F9DBF3D-8102-4725-AD43-BC5B141AECDF@charter.net>

They/You need smarter clients.......

Frank Filippone
red735i at earthlink.net


It's a client thing.
When they get an image, they press the 100% button to check, thinking  
that that's all there is to image quality.
Though I have had an acquaintance tell me that the print machinery  
doesn't read anything over 8 megs.
S.d.





Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)