Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Farah, Afghanistan
From: leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson)
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:46:25 -0600
References: <C7BD6A88.5F188%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I feel the same about canons.  I also feel that way about nikon wide  
zooms, having just ditched my 12-24 after using it for a couple of  
years and never being completely happy with it.

Leo Wesson
photographer?videographer
leo at leowesson.com
817?733?9157

On Mar 10, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

>> Canon wides are miserable.  No wonder they are ashamed of them.
>>
>> Tina
>
>
> I have no direct experience in this (Canon) but again my only  
> question would
> be how do the thousands of top photographers  and their art  
> directors and
> picture editors out there using them as we speak right now not be  
> aware of
> this and start a letter writing company to wherever Canon is in New  
> Jersey?
>
> I'm Canon Clueless but know that Nikons are in the fewer and far  
> between
> area out there. But closing. No longer a Nietzsche market.
> I know that wides are most commonly used and so are Canons.  
> Scattershots.
> So why is this not commonly known about scandal?
> Maybe Canon users use Sigma lenses? I don't think so though.
>
> [Rabs]
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Farah, Afghanistan)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Farah, Afghanistan)